Organic Letters
Letter
a
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
b
entry arylboron
initiator
additive (equiv)
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Mn(acac)3
−
−
18
32
57
66
49
84
53
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O
Na2CO3
CsF
K3PO4
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
c
d
e
no reaction
a
Unless otherwise specified, all reactions were performed at 80 °C for
8 h in toluene (2 mL) with 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), 2 (0.4 mmol, 2
equiv), Mn(OAc)3·2H2O (2 equiv), and an additive (0.2 mmol, 1
b
c
equiv) under an argon atmosphere. Isolated yield. Cs2CO3 (0.2
d
e
mmol, 1 equiv). 3 (0.4 mmol, 2 equiv). 4 (0.4 mmol, 2 equiv).
To corroborate the practicability of these transformations, we
performed gram scale reactions. Product 5 was provided with a
separation yield of 79%, and there was no obvious loss of
efficiency. We are pleased that arylboronic acids bearing
halides and a trifluoromethyl group provided the desired
products (17−23) in good yields. Notably, heteroarylboronic
acids, including pyrazol (24), thiophene (25), dibenzo[b,d]-
furan (26), 1-methyl-1H-indole (27), and benzofuran (28),
were also compatible. It is noteworthy that the reaction was
sensitive to the spatial volume of the substrates; for instance,
compound 21, with an o-chloro group, gave a moderate yield.
Next, the scope with respect to the 2-(2-isocyanophenyl)-
acetonitriles was studied [the synthetic method of the starting
2-(2-isocyanophenyl)acetonitriles is provided in the Support-
effects do not significantly affect the outcomes of the reaction.
Both electron-rich (29) and electron-deficient (30−33)
functional groups were quite compatible under the modified
conditions. According to the previous literature, it is difficult to
synthesize fully substituted quinoline compounds. To our great
surprise, regardless of whether an aryl group or an alkyl group
is at the benzyl position of 2-(2-isocyanophenyl)acetonitriles,
we can obtain fully substituted 3-aminoquinoline compounds
under the standard conditions (34−37). In addition,
arylboronic acids derived from clofibrate were smoothly
converted into the commensurable product, showing good
functional group tolerance to the reaction conditions (38).
Encouraged by the success of the oxidative cyclization of 2-
(2-isocyanophenyl)acetonitriles with arylboronic acids, we next
explored the more challenging alkyl radicals formed by
alkylboronic acids or alkyl-BF3K other than aryl radicals
(Scheme 2). Pleasingly, the reaction was not limited to
arylboronic acids, as primary alkylboronic acids (39−45) were
also competent radical donors. Furthermore, we found that
ether was also within reach (45). The cyclizations with
secondary alkylboronic acids (46) and cyclopentyl (47) and
-hexyl (48) were used, proceeded smoothly, and produced the
corresponding products with good efficiency (54−85% yields)
under the standard conditions. With iso-butyl-BF3K, the
quinolin-3-amine product (49) was obtained in 71% yield. It
is worth noting that an amide moiety (50) remained
Figure 1. Mn(III) enabled divergent synthesis of quinolin-3-amine
from 2-(2-isocyanophenyl)acetonitrile.
application of 2-(2-isocyanophenyl)acetonitriles to a radical
acceptor to construct quinolin-3-amine via a well-organized
and good regional selectivity electron transfer process. This
reaction features high reaction efficiency, valuable products,
mild reaction conditions, ease of execution, good functional
group compatibility, a broad substrate scope, and synthetic
applications.
We initiated our research with the reaction of 2-(2-
isocyanophenyl)acetonitrile (1) and (4-methoxyphenyl)-
boronic acid (2) using Mn(OAc)3·2H2O as an initiator in
toluene (Table 1). We focused on arylboronic acids as the
radical precursors because of their easy availability and air and
moisture stability; they are ideal arylation reagents. To our
delight, cyclization product 5 was successfully obtained in 18−
32% yield (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). The addition of Na2CO3
(1.0 equiv) led to a 57% yield of 5 after 8 h at 80 °C (Table 1,
entry 3). Encouraged by this result, we further investigated
bases, and the results showed that Cs2CO3 was the best one
compared to Na2CO3, K3PO4, and CsF, which led to a
significant increase in yield from 57% to 85% (Table 1, entries
4−6, respectively). 4-Methoxyphenyl-BF3K (3) and 2-(2-
isocyanophenyl)acetonitrile (1) could successfully undergo
oxidative cyclization to produce product 5 in 53% yield (Table
1, entry 7). It is noteworthy that arylborate 4 did not react in
this reaction (Table 1, entry 8).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we next
examined the range of arylboronic acids that are amenable to
this oxidative cyclization reaction (Scheme 1, top). Various
electron-neutral and electron-rich substituents on the aromatic
ring of arylboronic acids have been shown to be effective for
this transformation (5−16); furthermore, the structure of 5
was explicitly proven by X-ray single-crystal diffraction analysis.
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX