Structures of triorganoantimony(V) oximates
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 51, No. 6, June, 2002
1057
rameters and the NMR spectroscopic data for compound 1 are
given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
2. I. E. Pokrovskaya, V. A. Dodonov, Z. A. Starikova, E. N.
Kanunnikova, T. M. Shchegoleva, and G. P. Lebedev,
Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1981, 51, 1247 [J. Gen. Chem. USSR,
1981, 51 (Engl. Transl.)].
3. V. A. Dodonov, A. Yu. Fedorov, R. I. Usyatinskii, S. N.
Zaburdyaeva, and A. V. Gushchin, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser.
Khim., 1995, 748 [Russ. Chem. Bull., 1995, 44, 730 (Engl.
Transl.)].
4. S. N. Zaburdyaeva, L. S. Korchemnaya, A. Yu. Fedorov,
and V. A. Dodonov, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1999, 69, 86 [Russ.
J. Gen. Chem., 1999, 69 (Engl. Transl.)].
5. V. A. Dodonov, A. Yu. Fedorov, G. K. Fukin, S. N.
Zaburdyaeva, L. N. Zakharov, and A. V. Ignatenko, Main
Group Chemistry, 1999, 3, 15.
Triphenylantimony derivatives with aldehyde and ketone
oximes 2—4 were prepared analogously in a benzene solution.
The derivatives with dimethylglyoxime and diacetyl monoxime
were prepared in a 1 : 2 mixture of hexane and isopropyl alcohol.
Bis(acetone oximato)trimethylantimony (5). tertꢀButylhydroꢀ
peroxide (2 mmol) and acetone oxime (4 mmol) were placed in
a tube and dissolved in hexane (20 mL). Then calcined Na2SO4
was added. The resulting mixture was degassed and Me3Sb
(2 mmol) was recondensed into this tube under reduced presꢀ
sure. Then the mixture was kept at ∼20 °C for 2 h and the liquid
components were distilled off after which the residue slowly
crystallized. Compound 5 was obtained in 96% yield.
Xꢀray structure study of the crystals of the compounds
Ph3Sb(ONCMe2)2 (1) and Ph3Sb(ONCHPh)2 (2) was carried
out on a fourꢀcircle Siemens P3/PC diffratometer (graphite
monochromator, MoꢀKα radiation, θ/2θ scanning technique).
The crystals of 1 and 2 are monoclinic and tetragonal, respecꢀ
tively, at 20 °C a = 9.332(2) and 16.731(5) Å, b = 16.008(3)
and 16.731(5) Å, c = 15.743(3) and 19.867(6) Å, β = 99.78(2)°,
V = 2318(1) and 5562(3) Å3, space groups P21/n (Z = 4) and
I41/a (Z = 8), dcalc = 1.425 and 1.417 g cm–3 for compounds 1
and 2, respectively. The structures of complexes 1 and 2 were
solved by direct methods and refined by the fullꢀmatrix leastꢀ
squares method with anisotropic thermal parameters for all
nonhydrogen atoms. The positions of the H atoms of the Ph
groups in molecule 1 and all H atoms in molecule 2 were
revealed from difference electron density syntheses and refined
with isotropic thermal parameters. The positions of the H atꢀ
oms of the Me groups in molecule 1 were calculated from
geometric considerations (C—H 0.96 Å) and refined using the
riding model. The final R factors for complexes 1 and 2 were
R = 0.056 and 0.032, Rw = 0.107 and 0.073, S = 1.04 and 1.06
based on 4091 and 3160 reflections with I > 2σ(I ), respecꢀ
tively. All calculations were carried out with the use of the
SHELXꢀ97 program packages.19 The selected bond lengths and
bond angles in molecules 1 and 2 are given in Tables 3 and 4,
respectively. The atomic coordinates were deposited with the
Cambridge Structural Database.
6. A. V. Gushchin, R. I. Usyatinsky, G. K. Fukin, V. A.
Dodonov, and L. N. Zakharov, Main Group Chemistry,
1998, 2, 187.
7. V. K. Jain, R. Bohra, and R. C. Mehrotra, Inorg. Chim.
Acta, 1981, 51, 191.
8. V. A. Dodonov and A. V. Gushchin, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser.
Khim., 1993, 2043 [Russ. Chem. Bull., 1993, 42, 1955 (Engl.
Transl.)].
9. V. A. Dodonov, D. A. Gor´kaev, G. K. Fukin, A. V.
Gushchin, and T. I. Starostina, Abstrs. SchoolꢀConference
for Young Scientists, (Moscow, September 6—11, 1999), "Orꢀ
ganometallic Chemistry Towards the 21st Century," Moscow,
1999, RY101.
10. A. V. Gushchin, R. I. Usyatinskii, and V. A. Dodonov, Izv.
Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 1995, 154 [Russ. Chem. Bull., 1995,
44, 149 (Engl. Transl.)].
11. V. V. Sharutin, O. K. Sharutina, O. V. Molokova, S. I.
Rokhmanenko, T. G. Troinina, D. B. Krivolapov, A. T.
Gubaidullin, and I. A. Litvinov, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 2000,
70, 1990 [Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2000, 70 (Engl. Transl.)].
12. K. V. Domasevitch, N. N. Gerasimchuk, and A. Mokhir,
Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 1227.
13. E. V. Alekseevskii, R. K. Gol´ts, and A. P. Musakin,
Kolichestvennyi analiz [Quantitative Analysis], Goskhimizdat,
Leningrad, 1955, 135 pp. (in Russian).
14. S. V. Singh, S. Gupta, A. C. Ojha, and M. K. Rastogi, Ind.
J. Chem., Sec. A, 1991, 30, 545.
This study was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 00ꢀ15ꢀ97439)
in collaboration with the Center of Xꢀray Diffraction
Studies of the Division of the General and Technical
Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, by the
Program "Russian Universities" (Project No. 992839),
and by the Federal Target Program "Integration" (Project
No. A 0047).
15. O. K. Sharutina, Dr. Sci. (Chem.) Thesis, Blagoveshchensk
State Pedagogical University, Irkutsk, 2001, 50 pp. (in
Russian).
16. V. Karnojitzki, Les Peroxides Organiques, Hermann, Paris,
1959, 152 pp.
17. WeygandꢀHilgetag, OrganischenꢀChemischen Experimentierꢀ
kunst, Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, Leipzig, 1964,
800 pp.
18. Organic Syntheses, Collective Volume 2, Blatt, New
York, 1946.
19. W. Robinson and G. M. Sheldrick, in Crystallographic Comꢀ
puting Techniques and New Technologies, Eds. N. W. Isaacs
and M. R. Taylor, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (England),
1988, 366 pp.
References
1. K. A. Kocheshkov, A. P. Skoldinov, and N. N. Zemlyanskii,
Metody elementoorganicheskoi khimii. Sur´ma, vismut [Methꢀ
ods of Heteroorganic Chemistry. Antimony and Bismuth],
Nauka, Moscow, 1976, 483 pp. (in Russian).
Received July 19, 2001;
in revised form February 26, 2002