224
FINIKOVA et al.
Electronic absorption spectra*
7.02–7.13 (m, 16H), 7.74–7.84 (m, 12H), 8.47 (m, 8H);
MALDI-TOF, m/z: calcd. 871.65, found 869.33. 6b–
Pd; 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ): 9.35 (s, 4H), 9.16 (s, 8H), 7.24
(m, 8H), 7.00 (m, 8H), 4.06 (s, 24H); 13C NMR
(CDCl3): see Scheme 2; MALDI-TOF, m/z: calcd.
1382.24, found 1383.40.
Compound
TPP
M
λSoret (nm)
λQ (nm)
H2
414
412
439
426
442
428
514, 548, 588, 646
526
Pd
H2
Pd
H2
Pd
5a
5b
537, 580, 608, 674
536, 572
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research, project no. 01–03–33097–A.
O.S. Finikova is grateful to INTAS, grantYSF 2001/1-161.
538, 580, 614, 676
537, 575
REFERENCES
**
H2
6a
462
589, 635, 696
1. Bonnet, R., Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, vol. 24, pp. 19–33.
2. Brunel, M., Chaput, F., Vinogradov, S.A., et al., Chem.
Phys., 1997, vol. 218, pp. 301–307.
3. Kobayashi, N., Nevin, W.A., Mizunuma, S., et al.,
Chem. Phys. Lett., 1993, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 51–54.
4. Vinogradov, S.A. and Wilson, D.F., J. Chem. Soc., Per-
kin Trans. 2, 1994, pp. 103–111.
Pd
Pd
442
442
578, 626
6b
608 (sh), 630
* In CH Cl ; for 5a, 5b (M = H ), in CH Cl –Et N.
** Published data [7].
2
2
2
2
2
3
5. Vinogradov, S.A., Lo, L.-W., Jenkins, W.T., et al., Bio-
phys. J., 1996, vol. 70, pp. 1609–1617.
6. Kopranenkov, V.N., Dashkevich, S.N., and
Luk’yanets, E.A., Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1981, vol. 51,
pp. 2513–2517.
General Procedure for the Synthesis
of Tetrabenzoporphyrins 6a–M and 6b–M
2,3-Dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (2.7 g,
12 mmol) was added to a solution of porphyrin 5a–M
and 5b–M (M = Cu, Ni, Pd) (1 mmol, ~1 g) in anhy-
drous THF or dioxane (100 ml), and the mixture was
refluxed for 40–60 min. During this period, the solution
color changed from red-brown to bright green. The sol-
vent was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was dis-
solved in chloroform. The solution was washed with a
10% solution of sodium sulfite, a 10% solution of
sodium carbonate, and water. The organic layer was
separated, filtered through a silica gel layer 5–7 mm
thick (washed with chloroform), and dried over sodium
sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo and the
residue was recrystallized from a chloroform–ether
mixture. 6a–Pd: yield 95%; the UV and 1H NMR spec-
tra corresponded to those reported previously [4]. 6a–
Cu, yield 75–80%; MALDI-TOF, m/z: calcd. 876.50,
found 875.26. 6a–Ni, yield 25–30%; 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ):
7. Ichimura, K., Sakuragi, M., Morii, H., et al., Inorg.
Chim. Acta, 1991, vol. 182, pp. 83–86.
8. Ito, S., Ochi, N., Murashima, T., Uno, H., and Ono, N.,
Heterocycles, 2000, vol. 52, pp. 399–411.
9. Finikova, O., Cheprakov, A., Beletskaya, I., and Vino-
gradov, S., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 2001,
pp. 261–262.
10. Hopkins, P.B. and Fuchs, P.L., J. Org. Chem., 1978,
vol. 43, pp. 1208–1217.
11. Abel, Y., Haake, E., Haake, G., et al., Helv. Chim. Acta,
1998, vol. 81, pp. 1978–1996.
12. Lindsey, J.S., Schreiman, I.C., Hsu, H.C., et al., J. Org.
Chem., 1987, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 827–836.
13. Barkigia, K.M., Renner, M.W., Furenlid, L.R., et al.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, vol. 115, pp. 3627–3635.
14. Cheng, R.J., Chen, Y.R., Wang, S.L., and Cheng, C.Y.,
Polyhedron, 1993, vol. 12, pp. 1353–1360.
DOKLADY CHEMISTRY Vol. 391 Nos. 4–6 2003