J. Mol. Biol., 1991, 218, 837–846; (d ) C. A. Hunter, J. Mol. Biol.,
1993, 230, 1025–1054; (e) O. F. Schall and G. W. Gokel, J. Org.
Chem., 1996, 61, 1149–1458; ( f ) K. M. Guckian, B. A. Schweitzer,
R. X. F. Ren, C. J. Sheils, P. L. Paris, D. C. Tanmasseri and
E. T. Kool, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 8182–8183; (g) T. L. Ho,
P. Y. Liao and K. T. Wang, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995,
2437–2438; (h) D. Ranganathan, V. Haridas, R. Gilardi and
J. L. Karle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 10793–10800; (i) F. Chelli,
F. L. Gervasio, P. Procacci and V. Schettino, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 6133–6143 and references therein.; (j) F. Chelli,
F. L. Gervasio, P. Procacci and V. Schettino, Proteins, 2002, 48, 117–
125.
5 (a) C. A. Hunter, M. N. Meah and J.K.M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1990, 112, 5773–5780; (b) A. S. Shetty, J. Zhang and J. S.
Moore, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 1019–1027 and references
therein.; (c) G. W. Coates, A. R. Dunn, L. M. Henling, J. W. Ziller,
E. B. Lobkovsky and R. H. Grubbs, J. Am. Chem, Soc., 1998, 120,
3641–3649.
Hunter, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1996, 1723–1724;
(b) M.J. Cloninger and H.W. Whitlock, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
6153–6159; (c) S. Superchi, M.I. Donnoli, G. Proni, G.P. Spada
and C. Rosini, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 4762–4767. For the influ-
ence exerted by the edge-to-face interactions on the relative
orientation of different arenes, see; (d ) A. Garcia-Martinez,
J. Osio Barcina, A. de Fresno Cerezo and R. Gutierrez Rivas,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 673–679; (e) B. Uno, T. Iwamoto and
N. Okumura, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 9794–9800; ( f ) S. V.
Lindeman, D. Kosynkin and J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998,
120, 13268–13269; (g) For a review on the CH–π interactions, see:
M. Nishio, Y. Umezawa, M. Hirota and Y. Takeuchi, Tetrahedron,
1995, 51, 8665–8701.
14 See for instance: P.R. Ashton, D. Joachimi, N. Spencer,
J. F. Stoddardt, C. Tschierske, A. J. P. White, D. J. Williams and
K. Zab, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 1503–1506.
15 C. B. Martin, H. R. Mulla, P. G. Willis and A. Cammers-Goodwin,
J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 7802–7806.
6 (a) T. Dahl, Acta Chem. Scand., 1994, 48, 95–106; (b) J. H. Williams,
Acc. Chem. Res., 1993, 26, 593–598; (c) H. L. Anderson, A. Bashall,
K. Henrick, M. McPartlin and J. K. M. Sanders, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 429–431; (d ) I. Dance and M. Scuddar,
Chem. Eur. J., 1996, 2, 481–486; (e) Z. H. Wang, T. Hirose,
K. Hiratani, Y. Yang and K. Kasuga, Chem. Lett., 1996, 603–604;
( f ) C. B. Martin, B. O. Patrick and A. Cammers-Goodwin,
J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 7568–7578; (g) Y. Nakamura, H. Suzuki,
Y. Hayashida, T. Kudo and J. Nishimura, Liebigs Ann./Recueil,
1997, 1769–1776.
7 (a) W. L. Jorgensen and D. L. Severance, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,
112, 4768–4774; (b) C. A. Hunter and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 5525–5534; (c) P. Linse, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 4366–4373; (d ) P. Hobza, H. L. Selzle and E. W. Schlag,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3500–3506; (e) V. E. Williams,
R. P. Lemieux and G. R. Thatcher, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61,
1927–1933; ( f ) C. Chipot, R. Jaffe, B. Maigret, D. A. Pearlman and
P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 11217–11224; (g) J. M.
Seminario, A. G. Zacarias and J. M. Tour, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998,
120, 3970–3974; (h) S. Tsuzuki, K. Honda, T. Uchimaru, M. Mikami
and K. Tanabe, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2002, 124, 104–112; (i) M.
Claessens, L. Palombini, M. L. Stein and J. Reisse, Nouv. J. Chem.,
1982, 6, 595; (j) M. O. Sinnokrot, E. F. Valeev, C. D. Sherrill, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, in press.
8 The preference for the edge-to-face orientation has been
demonstrated for gaseous, liquid, and crystalline benzene: (a) X. Shi
and L. S. Bartell, J. Chem. Phys., 1988, 92, 5667–5673; (b) L. J.
Lowden and D. J. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys., 1974, 61, 5228–5241;
(c) D. Hall and D. E. Williams, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Cryst.
Phys., Diffr., Theor. Gen. Cryst., 1975, 31, 56–58 and references
therein.
9 (a) F. Cozzi, M. Cinquini, R. Annunziata, T. Dwyer and J. S. Siegel,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 5729–5733; (b) F. Cozzi, M. Cinquini,
R. Annunziata and J. S. Siegel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 5330–
5331; (c) F. Cozzi, F. Ponzini, R. Annunziata, M. Cinquini and
J. S. Siegel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1019–1020;
(d ) F. Cozzi and J. S. Siegel, Pure Appl. Chem., 1995, 67, 683–689.
10 (a) J. A. Zoltewicz, N. A. Maier and W. M. F. Fablan, J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 63, 4985–4990 and references therein; (b) N. Kaneta,
F. Mitamura, M. Uemura, Y. Murata and K. Komatsu, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1996, 37, 5835–5838.
11 (a) C. R. Patrick and G. S. Prosser, Nature, 1960, 187, 1021;
(b) J. H. Williams, J. K. Cockroft and A. N. Fitch, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 1655–1657; (c) R. E. Gillard, J. F. Stoddardt,
A. J. P. White, B. J. Williams and D. J. Williams, J. Org. Chem., 1996,
61, 4504–4505; (d ) G. W. Coates, A. B. Dunn, L. M. Henling,
D. A. Doughety and R. H. Grubbs, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1997, 36, 248–251; (e) F. Ponzini, R. Zagha, K. Hardcastle and
J. S. Siegel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2323–2325; ( f ) M. T.
Messina, P. Metrangolo, S. Pappalardo, M.F. Parisi, T. Pilati and
G. Resnati, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 3495–3500; (g) C. Y. Kim,
P. P. Chandra, A. Jain and D. W. Christianson, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 9620–9627 and references therein.
12 (a) F. J. Carver, C. A. Hunter and E. M. Seward, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 775–776; (b) F. J. Carver, C. A. Hunter,
D. J. Livingstone, J. F. McCabe and E. M. Seward, Chem. Eur. J.,
2002, 8, 2847–2859 and references therein; (c) E. Kim, S. Paliwal and
C. S. Wilcox, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 11192–11193 and
references therein; (d ) K. Nakamura and K. N. Houk, Org. Lett.,
1999, 1, 2049–2051; (e) Review: W. B. Jennings, B. M. Farrell and
J. F. Malone, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 885–894.
16 M. J. Rashkin and M. L. Waters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
1860–1861.
17 1-Bromo-2-methylnaphthalene can be used in excess because it
produces little of the homocoupling product under these conditions.
18 J. E. McMurry, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, 1513–1524.
19 R. G. R. Bacon and W. S. Lindsay, J. Chem. Soc., 1958, 1375–1381.
20 E. Abu-Shagra and J. Blum, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1991, 28, 473–475.
21 G.A. Molander and C.R. Harris, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 307–338.
22 For similar results see: (a) K. Ohmori, M. Kitamura and K. Suzuki,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1226–1229; (b) N. Taniguchi,
T. Hata and M. Uemura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1232–
1235; (c) R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini and L.
Raimondi, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1999, 3369–3374.
23 M. Benaglia, S. Toyota, C. R. Woods and J. S. Siegel, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1997, 38, 4737–4740.
24 (a) J. K. Stille, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1986, 25, 508–524; (b)
V. Farina, Pure Appl. Chem., 1996, 68, 73–78 and references therein.
25 A modification of the published procedure was used: R. G. Harvey,
S. H. Goh and C. Cortez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 3468–3479.
26 For the rotation around the aryl–aryl bond in 1-phenylbenzo[c]-
phenanthrene derivatives a ∆G≠ of ca. 54 kJ molϪ1 was determined;
the enantiomerization of the benzo[c]phenanthrene skeleton
requires a ∆G≠ of ca. 67 kJ molϪ1: W. H. Laarhoven, W. H. M. Peters
and A. H. A. Tinnemans, Tetrahedron, 1978, 34, 769–777 . In
molecules related to diols 1–3 this process requires even higher
energy (see ref. 22a).
27 For a review on the use of 2D EXSY NMR spectroscopy to measure
chemical dynamics, see: C. L. Perrin and T. J. Dwyer, Chem. Rev.,
1990, 90, 935–967.
28 Because of the logarithmic relationship between k and ∆G≠, the
major contribution to the error in determining ∆G≠ is the error in
the temperature. All spectra were measured with the same
instrumentation at similar temperatures. A liberal estimate of the
error is 1 kJ molϪ1
.
29 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A.
Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. J. Montgomery,
R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D.
Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone,
M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo,
S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui,
K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari,
J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu,
A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin,
D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara,
C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen,
M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon,
E. S. Replogle, J. A. Pople, Gaussian 98, Revision A.6, Pittsburgh PA,
1998.
30 A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 5648–5652. Structural
computations were performed using the hybrid density functional
method, B3LYP; Becke’s 3 parameter functional plus the nonlocal
correlation of Lee-Yang-Parr with both local and nonlocal terms.
Dunning’s DZV(2d,p) double-ζ valence basis set was employed.
Single point energy computations were performed on optimized
structures using MP2 dynamic correlation treatment for superior
energetic analysis.
31 (a) C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785–792;
(b) B. Miehlich, A. Savin, H. Stoll and H. Preuss, Chem. Phys. Lett.,
1989, 157, 200–207.
32 T. H. Dunning, Jr., P. J. Hay, Modern Theoretical Chemistry;
Plenum, New York, 1976, pp. 1–28.
33 J. M. L. Martin, Chem. Phys. Lett, 1996, 262, 97–104.
34 C. Moller and M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev., 1934, 46, 618–622.
13 For recent examples of molecular recognition between arenes based
on an edge-to-face interaction, see: (a) A. P. Poisson and C. A.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 3 , 1, 1 5 7 – 1 6 2
162