by Lewis acids9 and tetraalkylammonium halides.10 The last
of these reactions proceeds via nucleophilic opening of the
oxirane ring with formation of 2-haloethoxide, which sub-
sequently adds to the carbonyl group with the formation of
an O-anion of the hemiacetal. All these steps are reversible
except the last one, cyclization of an anion with the formation
of 2-substituted 1,3-dioxolanes, that drives the reaction to
completion.11 The main drawback of this protocol is the
necessity of operation with highly toxic gaseous ethylene
oxide, thus limiting its routine use. Application of 2-chloro-
and 2-bromoethanol as sources of 2-haloalkoxide anions was
reported12 but was limited to highly electrophilic carbonyl
groups, such as, e.g., 4-nitrobenzaldehyde,13 1,2-dicarbonyl
compounds,14 and highly chlorinated15 or fluorinated ke-
tones.16 For the less-electrophilic carbonyl compounds, such
as benzaldehyde, irreversible intramolecular substitution to
ethylene oxide dominates, making formation of 1,3-diox-
olanes unsuccessful.17
benzaldehyde was chosen as a model carbonyl compound
possessing intermediate electrophilicity. On the basis of our
early studies of reactions of γ-halocarbanions and optimiza-
tion of the reaction conditions, we have found that t-BuOK
in a DMF/THF mixture at low temperature ensures good
results of the desired process. A series of reactions with
aldehydes were carried out on the preparative 50 mmol scale,
and the products were isolated by distillation (Table 1).19,20
In most cases, aldehydes were cleanly converted into
dioxolanes, without competing side processes, thus conver-
sions and purities of products were determined by 1H NMR
(integration of formyl and benzylidene protons). We observed
that the total conversion of an aldehyde is strongly dependent
on temperature. At -60 °C, it reaches the optimum. At higher
temperatures, conversions are lower, and at lower temper-
atures, problems with efficient stirring occurred as a con-
sequence of the viscosity of the mixture.21 An interesting
influence of substituents on conversion was noticed. In this
system, two competing processes operate (Scheme 1)sintra-
and intermolecularsand only the latter depends on the
electrophilicity of the aldehyde carbonyl group. Thus, the
results obtained correlate with the “effective electrophilicity”
of the carbonyl group as a superposition of electronic and
steric effects of the substituents. A methoxy group located
at the para position (entry 1) retards the reaction strongly,
whereas at the ortho position (entry 3), this mesomeric
influence is diminished. Finally, the m-MeO substituent
(entry 2) exhibits the weakest deactivating effect as can be
expected from simple resonance considerations. It should be
emphasized that even a weak donor-like methyl group
(entries 4 and 5) induced a measurable effect on the
conversion. Most other aldehydes reacted quantitatively, and
in some cases, isolated yields were affected by the isolation
procedure.22 Nonenolizable aliphatic aldehyde (entry 19)
reacted quantitatively, whereas enolizable 2-methylbutanal
underwent self-condensation as determined by GC/MS
analysis of the reaction mixture.23
In this communication, we present a practical protocol for
the protection of nonenolizable aldehydes and ketones under
basic, kinetically controlled conditions.18
For our initial attempts of synthesis of 1,3-dioxolanes,
(5) For carbanions, cyclization to a three-membered ring is faster than
that to a five-membered ring, whereas for O-anions, the opposite is true:
Gronert, S.; Azizian, K.; Friedman, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
3220-3226.
(6) For a review of protecting group chemistry, see, for example: (a)
Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. ProtectiVe Groups in Organic Synthesis,
3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1999. (b) Kocien˜ski, P. J.
Protecting Groups 3rd ed.; Thieme Verlag: New York, 1994.
(7) (a) Showler, A. J.; Darley, P. A. Chem. ReV. 1967, 67, 427-440. (b)
Klausener, A.; Fraunrath, H.; Mikhail, G. K.; Lange, W.; Schneider, S.;
Schro¨der, D. In Houben-Weyl Methoden der organischen Chemie; Hage-
mann, H., Klamann, D., Eds.; Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart: 1991; Vol.
E14a, Part 1, pp 232-234. (c) MacPherson, D. T.; Rawi, H. K. In Function
Bearing Two Oxygens R1 C(OR2)2 in ComprehensiVe Organic Functional
2
Group Transformations; Katritzky, A. R., Meth-Cohn, O., Rees, Ch. W.,
Eds.; Pergamon Elsevier Science: Oxford, 1995; Vol. 4, pp 159-214. (d)
Hoffman, W. Ch. Ethylene Glycol. In Handbook of Reagents for Organic
Synthesis. ActiVating Agents and Protecting Groups; Pearson, A. J., Roush,
W. J., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, 1999.
(8) For recent examples, see: (a) Yu, M.; Pagenkopf, B. L. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 2765-2771. (b) Chen, Ch.-T.; Weng, S.-S.; Kao, J.-Q.; Lin, Ch.-
Ch.; Jan, M.-D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3343-3346. (c) Fuchs, B.; Nelson, A.;
Star, A.; Stoddart, J. F.; Vidal, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4220-
4224. (d) Kim, Y. J.; Varma, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7447-
7449. (e) Kumar, R.; Chakraborti, A. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8319-
8323.
(18) Some specific methods of formation of acetals under basic conditions
were described. (a) Base-promoted acetal formation with phenyl salicy-
lates: Perlmutter, P.; Puniani, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3755-3756.
(b) Acetalization of aldehydes catalyzed by TiCl4 in a basic medium: Clerici,
A.; Pastori, N.; Porta, O. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 15679-15690. (c) Synthesis
of acetals from phenols and 1,1-dihaloalkanes: Dehmlow, E. V.; Schmidt,
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 95-96.
(19) Typical procedure: To a vigorously stirred solution of benzalde-
hyde (5.30 g; 50 mmol) and 2-chloroethanol (6.04 g; 75 mmol) in DMF
(20 mL) and THF (10 mL) at -60 °C under argon was added dropwise a
solution of t-BuOK (8.40 g; 75 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) for 30 min. Then,
the mixture was stirred for 90 min and aqueous NH4Cl, brine, and water
were added. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (5 × 70 mL),
and combined organic phases were washed with brine (3 × 100 mL) and
dried with MgSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue
was distilled under reduced pressure (see Supporting Information for details).
(20) p-NO2- and p-NMe2-substituted benzaldehydes and terephthalalde-
hyde were unsoluble under the reaction conditions. Cinnamaldehyde
substantially polymerized during the reaction; however, small amounts of
the acetal were obtained.
(9) Torok, D. S.; Figueroa, J. J.; Scott, W. J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
7274-7276 and references therein.
(10) Nerdel, F.; Buddrus, J.; Scherowsky, G.; Klamann, D.; Fligge, M.
Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1967, 710, 85-89.
(11) Font, J.; Gala´n, M. A.; Virgili, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1986, 75-78 and references therein.
(12) (a) Newkome, G. R.; Sauer, J. D.; McClure, G. L. Tetrahedron Lett.
1973, 1599-1602. (b) Newkome, G. R.; Sauer, J. D.; Staires, S. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1977, 42, 3524-3527.
(13) Schmitz, E. Ber. 1958, 91, 410-414.
(14) (a) Kuhn, R.; Trischmann, H. Ber. 1961, 94, 2258-2263. (b) Abe,
M.; Adam, W.; Borden, W. T.; Hattori, M.; Hrovat, D. A.; Nojima, M.;
Nozaki, K.; Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 574-582. (c) Magnus,
Ph.; Giles, M.; Bonnert, R.; Kim, Ch. S.; McQuire, L.; Merritt, A.; Vicker,
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4403-4405. (d) Magnus, Ph.; Giles, M.;
Bonnert, R.; Johnson, G.; McQuire, L.; Deluca, M.; Merritt, A.; Kim, Ch.
S.; Vicker, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8116-8129.
(15) Stedman, R. J.; Davis, L. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 4915-4916.
(16) (a) Simmons, H. E.; Wiley, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82,
2288-2296. (b) He, Y.; Junk, Ch. P.; Cawley, J. J.; Lemal, D. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5590-5591. (c) Ref 7b and references therein.
(17) Attempts to protect benzaldehyde as 1,3-dioxolane with bromo-
ethanol were unsuccessful; see footnote 12 in: Sammakia, T.; Hurley, T.
B. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 974-978.
(21) A substantially decreased temperature (-60 °C) favors addition of
a 2-haloethoxide anion to the carbonyl group; however, for more electro-
philic aldehydes, such as p-bromobenzaldehyde, complete conversion of
the substrate is reached also at higher temperatures, e.g., -30 °C.
(22) E.g., solubility of products in the water phase containing DMF during
workup or small differences of boiling points of ingredients of the reaction
mixture.
(23) In the reaction with pivalaldehyde, we were unable to separate the
acetal from the mixture of solvents in a pure form.
3746
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 17, 2006