Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

854049-33-5

Post Buying Request

854049-33-5 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

854049-33-5 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 854049-33-5 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 8,5,4,0,4 and 9 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 3 and 3 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 854049-33:
(8*8)+(7*5)+(6*4)+(5*0)+(4*4)+(3*9)+(2*3)+(1*3)=175
175 % 10 = 5
So 854049-33-5 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

854049-33-5Downstream Products

854049-33-5Relevant articles and documents

Electronic optimization of heteroleptic Ru(II) bipyridine complexes by remote substituents: Synthesis, characterization, and application to dye-sensitized solar cells

Han, Won-Sik,Han, Jung-Kyu,Kim, Hyun-Young,Choi, Mi Jin,Kang, Yong-Soo,Pac, Chyongjin,Kang, Sang Ook

, p. 3271 - 3280 (2011)

We prepared a series of new heteroleptic ruthenium(II) complexes, Ru(NCS)2LL0 (3a-3e), where L is 4,40-di(hydroxycarbonyl)-2,20-bipyridine and L0 is 4,40-di(p-Xphenyl)- 2,20-pyridine (X = CN (a), F (b), H (c), OMe (d), and NMe2 (e)), in an attempt to explore the structure-activity relationships in their photophysical and electrochemical behavior and in their performance in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). When substituent X is changed from electron-donating NMe2 to electron-withdrawing CN, the absorption and emission maxima reveal systematic bathochromic shifts. The redox potentials of these dyes are also significantly influenced by X. The electronic properties of the dyes were theoretically analyzed using density functional theory calculations; the results show good correlations with the experimental results. The solar-cell performance of DSSCs based on dye-grafted nanocrystalline TiO2 using 3a-3e and standard N3 (bis[(4,40-carboxy-2,20-bipyridine)(thiocyanato)]ruthenium(II)) were compared, revealing substantial dependences on the dye structures, particularly on the remote substituent X. The 3d-based device showed the best performance: η = 8.30%, JSC = 16.0 mA 3 cm-2, VOC = 717 mV, and ff = 0.72. These values are better than N3-based device. 2011 American Chemical Society. 2011 American Chemical Society.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 854049-33-5